groovyvorti.blogg.se

Posterazor insufficient data for an image
Posterazor insufficient data for an image





posterazor insufficient data for an image

All said, it would have been easier in that case, to have just started with a good 3-view and not use the free flight plan that I had cut the keels from.Īnother great unusual model build Bill, looking forward to seeing this one develop. At that point, I didn't want to scrap the work that I had completed, so I merged the plan with fuse former sections rescaled from a good 3-view. After the fuse keels had been cut for my Stosser, I then realized that the fuse sections from the free flight plan were inaccurate. Since my Stosser scratch build, I'll always consider scrapping a plan and developing a 3-view into a plan, if the plan is not accurate. They would be too difficult to resolve into useful sections, when I have better ones on hand. The Jetco plan places the stringers over the formers, to eliminate then need for notch cuts, as well as being not 100% accurate. The fuse formers are being developed from other 3-views however. I've started cutting fuse keels now.įor this build, the Jetco plan is laid out well enough to use it as a basic plan. I'll start to enjoy the project, once I have a fuse frame coming together. The only interesting part is that it gives you time to think about the design, make modifications to the plan, and in some cases, develop a plan from a 3-view. Cleaning up the grainy drawing by sketching over is necessary, but you still aren't building anything. I want to be building, and don't much enjoy rescaling, printing, trimming, and taping drawings together. I haven't cut fuse formers yet, so it will help in determining what the correct shape is, when comparing with photos.Īs much as I enjoy scratch building, starting builds is the most difficult part for me.

posterazor insufficient data for an image

The more the better, as they all seem to disagree a bit. I haven't seen that 3-view and will save it. Model photoshopped in the air, planned for speed 280: It's reprinted and all taped together, and is something like 30 sheets now, since it is properly scaled for 34/5" span. The first attempt at printing the 25 sheet plan was a waste. Some idiot thought that they had the re-scaling procedure down pat, and didn't double check before printing. Here goes trimming and clear taping 50 odd sheets together.Įdit: More than $20 in ink. I also found an excellent restoration write up, and a sketch with more accurate sections than the Jetco plan has, all of which will be printed for reference. With $20 invested in printer ink, I'd better go ahead with the project. May have to wait for the tall grass for this one.Īs usual, I don't do fantasy threads, so the printer is running off the enlarged Jetco plan as I type now. I'll attempt to model all those features, and I can always just not use the flap-camber change in flight, if it proves troublesome. The plane has some challenging scale features such as retracts (like the Grumman F3F and Wildcat), flaperons, and a front wing section which pivots downward with the flaperons to change the wing camber. The more I research it, the more interesting it becomes. I've been kicking around modeling subject ideas since completing the Saro A1, and haven't found anything that is both unique, and that I like.







Posterazor insufficient data for an image